A visitor views images that load in the same size that are displayed, but can click to view full size image #190

New issue

Open

opened 2019-02-05 02:41:47 +00:00 by mlncn · 3 comments

mlncn commented

2019-02-05 02:41:47 +00:00

(Migrated from gitlab.com)

In the Teachers with GUTS case study for example the Bookmarks graphic is presented at, at the very largest, 818 by 397. Even at that size, it has some barely legible text. Clicking the image does not provide a larger version. Yet the image that is actually loaded is 2554 by 1240.

Instead, here's what should happen:

An inserted image is sized to the maximum width it can be displayed. This requires knowledge of the theme, and so should be configurable.
It is automatically linked to its full-sized version, if someone wants to click on it. I suppose in a nearly-full-browser-window lightbox.

I think an automatic solution would be not much harder than even conceiving the steps for a manual version, let alone doing it every time.

Thoughts @cedewey @gnuget @dinarcon ?

This is exactly what we're supposed to be able to get right with Drupal, and apparently Drupal out of the box does it exactly wrong. It's aggravating and makes me want to throw out the whole way inline images are done. In the [Teachers with GUTS](https://agaric.coop/work/teachers-guts) case study for example the Bookmarks graphic is presented at, at the very largest, 818 by 397. Even at that size, it has some barely legible text. Clicking the image does not provide a larger version. Yet the image that is actually loaded is 2554 by 1240. Instead, here's what should happen: 1. An inserted image is sized to the maximum width it can be displayed. This requires knowledge of the theme, and so should be configurable. 2. It is automatically linked to its full-sized version, if someone wants to click on it. I suppose in a nearly-full-browser-window lightbox. I think an automatic solution would be not much harder than even conceiving the steps for a manual version, let alone doing it every time. Thoughts @cedewey @gnuget @dinarcon ?

mlncn commented

2022-03-08 23:30:10 +00:00

(Migrated from gitlab.com)

marked this issue as related to #218

mlncn commented

2022-03-08 23:32:21 +00:00

(Migrated from gitlab.com)

changed health status to needs attention

changed health status to **needs attention**

mlncn commented

2023-06-14 17:05:41 +00:00

(Migrated from gitlab.com)

marked this issue as related to #237

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: agaric/agaric-coop#190

No description provided.